Circadian performance differences between morning and evening 'types'

Two groups of subjects identified as either morning (M) or evening (E) types, determined by a self-assessment questionnaire, were measured for performance efficiency at a simulated production-line inspection task given for 15 sessions at different times of the waking day. Systematic fatigue and prac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ergonomics 1980-01, Vol.23 (1), p.29-36
Hauptverfasser: HORNE, J. A., BRASS, C. G., PETITT, A. N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two groups of subjects identified as either morning (M) or evening (E) types, determined by a self-assessment questionnaire, were measured for performance efficiency at a simulated production-line inspection task given for 15 sessions at different times of the waking day. Systematic fatigue and practice effects were minimised by a random presentation of these sessions over a series of days. Although there were no significant within- or between-group changes with circadian trends for items erroneously rejected, significant differences were apparent with the number of items correctly rejected. M types' correct rejection levels were significantly better than E types' in the morning, whereas they were worse during the evening. Whilst E types showed a steady improvement throughout the day, M types showed a general decline. A post-lunch dip in performance was quite evident for M types, but not for E types. In addition, the circadian trends in correct rejection levels and body temperature were highly positively correlated for E types, but a significant negative relationship between these parameters was found for M types. These findings are discussed.
ISSN:0014-0139
1366-5847
DOI:10.1080/00140138008924715