Effects of a Xe dopant on an Ar gas-puff implosion on Z

Two Ar gas-puff experiments, each using loads consisting of two annuli and a center jet, were recently performed on Sandia National Laboratories' Z machine. These shots had the same load except that one of them (Z2603) employed a Xe dopant of 0.8% by number in the jet, which was not present in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics of plasmas 2016-12, Vol.23 (12)
Hauptverfasser: Apruzese, J. P., Giuliani, J. L., Ouart, N. D., Tangri, V., Harvey-Thompson, A. J., Jones, B., Jennings, C. A., Hansen, S. B., Ampleford, D. J., Rochau, G. A., Coverdale, C. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two Ar gas-puff experiments, each using loads consisting of two annuli and a center jet, were recently performed on Sandia National Laboratories' Z machine. These shots had the same load except that one of them (Z2603) employed a Xe dopant of 0.8% by number in the jet, which was not present in the otherwise identical Z2605. The extensive diagnostics deployed in these experiments reveal that the presence of this small fraction of Xe had a significant effect on the emitted K-shell radiation. Use of the Xe dramatically reduced the Ar K-shell yield from 373 ± 9% to 129 ± 9% kJ. However, the total yield increased, from 1.02 ± 17% to 1.14 ± 17% MJ. Also, the K-shell power pulse for Z2603 exhibited two nearly equal peaks separated by ∼5 ns, but that of Z2605 consisted of a more conventional single peak. Analysis of time- and space resolved K-shell spectra using a detailed atomic model for Ar ions indicates that a much greater fraction of the load mass was heated to the K-shell in the non-Xe shot Z2605. Previous average-ion atomic calculations of Xe cooling rates [Post et al., At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 20, 397 (1977)] show that the radiative cooling of the small 0.8% Xe fraction is nonetheless significant compared to that of the Ar and is therefore likely responsible for the differences in the shots.
ISSN:1070-664X
1089-7674
DOI:10.1063/1.4972877