Intimidation of Researchers by Special-Interest Groups

To the Editor: As the complainant in the example involving multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome discussed in “The Messenger under Attack” Sounding Board article by Deyo et al. (April 14 issue), 1 I wish to correct some of the authors' many errors that grossly misrepresent this case and its ap...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 1997-10, Vol.337 (18), p.1314-1319
1. Verfasser: Donnay, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To the Editor: As the complainant in the example involving multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome discussed in “The Messenger under Attack” Sounding Board article by Deyo et al. (April 14 issue), 1 I wish to correct some of the authors' many errors that grossly misrepresent this case and its applicability to their thesis. At issue in the study by Simon et al. of the immunology of multiple chemical sensitivity 2 was not the investigators' published results but what they withheld from peer review and publication — namely, a split-sample analysis of the reliability of their immune laboratory, showing, as Dr. Simon himself later . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJM199710303371813