Incidence of germline mutations in risk genes including BRCA1/2 in consecutive ovarian cancer (OC) patients (AGO TR-1)
Background: Identification of families at risk for OC including recommendation for prophylactic surgery is the only effective method to reduce OC mortality. In addition, BRCA1/2 mutations are known as prognostic factor and target for treatment. Methods: Prospective counseling and testing of consecut...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng ; ger |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Identification of families at risk for OC including recommendation for prophylactic surgery is the only effective method to reduce OC mortality. In addition,
BRCA1/2
mutations are known as prognostic factor and target for treatment.
Methods:
Prospective counseling and testing of consecutive patients with first diagnosis or platinum sensitive relapse of invasive epithelial OC. Testing of 25 risk genes related to ovarian cancer. A positive mutation was defined as class 4/5 mutation and a positive family history was defined as at least one relative with breast cancer (BC) or OC or BC in personal history.
Results:
In total, 529 pts entered the study, of which 507 were analyzed so far: 270 (53%) patients with first diagnosis of OC and 237 (47%) patients with platinum sensitive relapse. In total, 21% were
BRCA1
/
2
positive (
BRCA
positive) and 27% for a mutation in at least one risk gene. The incidence of mutations in
BRCA1
was 15%,
BRCA2
: 6%,
RAD51C
: 1.8%,
PALB2
: 1.2%. Mutations in all others were found less frequently (< 1%). In elderly patients (> 70 years), 13% carried a mutation in a risk gene compared to 31% of patients ≤70 years (p < 0.001). Family history identified 69% of the
BRCA1/2
positive patients, but missed 31%.
Conclusions:
27% of all OC pts harbor a positive mutation in the genes analyzed. Age and FH are insufficient for identifying these patients. Genetic testing should therefore be offered to every patient with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer; limiting testing to BRCA1/2 analysis seems insufficient. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-5751 1438-8804 |
DOI: | 10.1055/s-0036-1592705 |