Telithromycin is as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanate in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis
This randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a short, 5-day course of telithromycin, a new ketolide antibacterial, compared with a standard 10-day course of amoxicillin/clavulanate, in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). The study enrolled 3...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Respiratory medicine 2002-11, Vol.96 (11), p.862-871 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a short, 5-day course of telithromycin, a new ketolide antibacterial, compared with a standard 10-day course of amoxicillin/clavulanate, in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). The study enrolled 325 adult patients with AECB and a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients received either telithromycin 800mg once daily (qd) for 5 days (followed by placebo for 5 days) or amoxicillin/clavulanate 500/125mg three times daily (tid) for 10 days. Clinical cure rates for telithromycin post-therapy (Days 17–21, test-of-cure) and late post-therapy (Days 31–36) were 86.1 and 78.1%, respectively; 82.1 and 75.0% for amoxicillin/clavulanate. Excellent clinical cure rates were also observed for high-risk patients. Bacteriologic outcome was satisfactory for 69.2% of telithromycin recipients
vs 70.0% for amoxicillin/clavulanate recipients. Both treatments were generally well tolerated, although the frequency of drug-related adverse events was almost two-fold higher for amoxicillin/clavulanate (25.0
vs. 13.1%). Thus, a 5-day course of telithromycin 800mgqd is an effective and well-tolerated alternative to a standard 10-day course of amoxicillin/clavulanate 500/125mg tid for first-line empiric treatment of AECB in adults with COPD. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0954-6111 1532-3064 |
DOI: | 10.1053/rmed.2002.1382 |