Prepubic Urethrostomy: A Long-Term Study in 16 Cats
Objective— To investigate the indications for and long‐term outcome of prepubic urethrostomy (PPU) in the cat. Study Design— Retrospective survey. Animals— Sixteen cats that had undergone PPU. Methods— Data were recovered from the medical records of the cats. Follow‐up information was obtained from...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary surgery 2001-03, Vol.30 (2), p.107-113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective— To investigate the indications for and long‐term outcome of prepubic urethrostomy (PPU) in the cat.
Study Design— Retrospective survey.
Animals— Sixteen cats that had undergone PPU.
Methods— Data were recovered from the medical records of the cats. Follow‐up information was obtained from the owners and referring veterinarians.
Results— Indications for PPU were: failed perineal urethrostomy for the management of idiopathic lower urinary tract disease (ILUTD) (8 cats) or urethral trauma (1 cat); unresolved pelvic urethral obstruction after recurrent ILUTD (5 cats); and stenosis of the pelvic urethra as a result of trauma (2 cats). A patent urethral stoma was created in all cases. Signs of lower urinary tract disease were present in 8 cats postoperatively. With appropriate dietary management, these signs resolved in 2 cats and improved in another 4 cats. Eleven cats experienced postoperative complications that consisted of peristomal skin irritation or necrosis (7 cats) and urinary incontinence (6 cats). Complications developed in the immediate postoperative period in 6 cats, and resolved in 2 of these. Six cats developed late complications, at 6 to 84 months postoperatively. Six cats were euthanatized between 1 and 26 months' postoperatively. The mean survival time in these cats was 13 months. Reasons for euthanasia included urinary incontinence (3 cats), skin necrosis (2 cats), and unresolvable ILUTD (1 cat).
Conclusions— PPU is a salvage procedure that is successful in relieving the signs of urinary tract obstruction and preventing further obstruction. However, potential complications should limit its use to cases in which standard techniques for perineal urethrostomy cannot be performed.
Clinical Relevance— PPU is a comparatively simple procedure that should be considered as a salvage technique for obstructive disease of the pelvic urethra. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0161-3499 1532-950X |
DOI: | 10.1053/jvet.2001.20327 |