Impact of cathodic pH and bioaugmentation on acetate and CH 4 production in a microbial electrosynthesis cell

This study compares carbon dioxide conversion in carbonate-fed microbial electrosynthesis (MES) cells operated at low (5.3), neutral (7) and high (8) pH levels and inoculated either with wild-type or bioaugmented mixed microbial populations. Two 100 mL (cathode volume) MES cells inoculated with anae...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:RSC advances 2024-07, Vol.14 (32), p.22962-22973
Hauptverfasser: Nwanebu, Emmanuel, Jezernik, Mara, Lawson, Christopher, Bruant, Guillaume, Tartakovsky, Boris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study compares carbon dioxide conversion in carbonate-fed microbial electrosynthesis (MES) cells operated at low (5.3), neutral (7) and high (8) pH levels and inoculated either with wild-type or bioaugmented mixed microbial populations. Two 100 mL (cathode volume) MES cells inoculated with anaerobic digester sludge were operated with a continuous supply of carbonate solution (5 g L as CO ). Acetate production was highest at low pH, however CH production still persisted, possibly due to pH gradients within the cathodic biofilm, resulting in acetate and CH volumetric (per cathode compartment volume) production rates of 1.0 ± 0.1 g (L d) and 0.84 ± 0.05 L (L d) , respectively. To enhance production of carboxylic acids, four strains of acetogenic bacteria ( , , , and ) were added to both MES cells. In the bioaugmented MES cells, acetate production increased to 2.0 g (L d) . However, production of other carboxylic acids such as butyrate and caproate was insignificant. Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene sequencing of cathodic biofilm and suspended biomass suggested a low density of introduced acetogenic bacteria implying that selective pressure rather than bioaugmentation led to improved acetate production.
ISSN:2046-2069
2046-2069
DOI:10.1039/d4ra03906h