An X-ray fluorescence and machine learning based methodology for the direct non-destructive compositional analysis of (Th 1− x U x )O 2 fuel pellets
A highly sensitive analytical method for elemental quantification of U in (Th 1− x U x )O 2 mixed oxide (MOX) fuel pellets is extremely necessary for nuclear fuel quality control. It will be an added advantage if the analytical method is direct and non-destructive. Presently we have demonstrated a d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry 2023-08, Vol.38 (9), p.1841-1850 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A highly sensitive analytical method for elemental quantification of U in (Th
1−
x
U
x
)O
2
mixed oxide (MOX) fuel pellets is extremely necessary for nuclear fuel quality control. It will be an added advantage if the analytical method is direct and non-destructive. Presently we have demonstrated a direct non-destructive methodology for (Th
1−
x
U
x
)O
2
MOX fuel pellets by the X-ray fluorescence technique using U/Th M lines as the analytical line instead of the well resolved U/Th Lα
1
lines. U/Th M lines were selected as they could be excited using low-energy excitation. In the present study, we have used seven (Th
1−
x
U
x
)O
2
MOX fuel pellets with varying U/Th concentrations. All the MOX pellets were prepared
via
the sol–gel micro-sphere pelletization (SGMP) process. All the pellets were presented for μ-XRF measurements. Each pellet was measured at 10 different spots to construct an input data set. Analytical parameters like relative error and precision obtained from the classical FP-based method utilizing U/Th M lines are 22.4% and 4.9%, respectively. To improve the same parameters, we employed a classical chemometric method like partial least square regression (PLSR). It produced the above-mentioned analytical parameters ∼3.0%. Furthermore, an optimized ANN-based modeling methodology generated a relative error and precision for the U determination in the test sample of 3.1% and 4.9%. The comparative study suggests that both the ANN-based methodology and PLSR outperform the classical FP-based methodology for the analytical quantification of U/Th in MOX by employing U/Th M lines as the analytical line. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0267-9477 1364-5544 |
DOI: | 10.1039/D3JA00158J |