Plasma Membrane Proteolipid 3 Protein Modulates Amphotericin B Resistance throughSphingolipid Biosynthetic Pathway
Invasive opportunistic fungal infections of humans are common among those sufferingfrom impaired immunity and are difficult to treat resulting in high mortality.Amphotericin B (AmB) is one of the few antifungals available to treat suchinfections. The AmB resistance mechanisms reported so far mainly...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2015-05, Vol.5 (1), Article 9685 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Invasive opportunistic fungal infections of humans are common among those sufferingfrom impaired immunity and are difficult to treat resulting in high mortality.Amphotericin B (AmB) is one of the few antifungals available to treat suchinfections. The AmB resistance mechanisms reported so far mainly involve decrease inergosterol content or alterations in cell wall. In contrast, depletion ofsphingolipids sensitizes cells to AmB. Recently, overexpression of
PMP3
gene,encoding plasma membrane proteolipid 3 protein, was shown to increase and itsdeletion to decrease, AmB resistance. Here we have explored the mechanistic basis of
PMP3
effect on AmB resistance. It was found that ergosterol content andcell wall integrity are not related to modulation of AmB resistance by
PMP3
.A few prominent phenotypes of
PMP3
delete strain, namely, defective actinpolarity, impaired salt tolerance and reduced rate of endocytosis are also notrelated to its AmB-sensitivity. However,
PMP3
overexpression mediatedincrease in AmB resistance requires a functional sphingolipid pathway. Moreover, AmBsensitivity of strains deleted in
PMP3
can be suppressed by the addition ofphytosphingosine, a sphingolipid pathway intermediate, confirming the importance ofthis pathway in modulation of AmB resistance by
PMP3
. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
DOI: | 10.1038/srep09685 |