Key roles of hydrophobic rings of TM2 in gating of the α 9 α 10 nicotinic cholinergic receptor
We have performed a systematic mutagenesis of three hydrophobic rings (17′, 13′ and 9′) within transmembrane region (TM) 2 of the α 9 α 10 nicotinic cholinergic receptor (nAChR) to a hydrophilic (threonine) residue and compared the properties of mutant receptors reconstituted in Xenopus laevis oocyt...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of pharmacology 2009-01, Vol.145 (7), p.963-974 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We have performed a systematic mutagenesis of three hydrophobic rings (17′, 13′ and 9′) within transmembrane region (TM) 2 of the
α
9
α
10 nicotinic cholinergic receptor (nAChR) to a hydrophilic (threonine) residue and compared the properties of mutant receptors reconstituted in
Xenopus laevis
oocytes.
Phenotypic changes in
α
9
α
10 mutant receptors were evidenced by a decrease in the desensitization rate, an increase in both the EC
50
for ACh as well as the efficacy of partial agonists and the reduction of the allosteric modulation by extracellular Ca
2+
.
Mutated receptors exhibited spontaneous openings and, at the single‐channel level, an increased apparent mean open time with no major changes in channel conductance, thus suggesting an increase in gating of the channel as the underlying mechanism.
Overall, the degrees of the phenotypes of mutant receptors were more overt in the case of the centrally located V13′T mutant.
Based on the atomic model of the pore of the electric organ of the
Torpedo
ray, we can propose that the interactions of side chains at positions 13′ and 9′ are key ones in creating an energetic barrier to ion permeation.
In spite of the fact that the roles of the TM2 residues are mostly conserved in the distant
α
9
α
10 member of the nAChR family, their mechanistic contributions to channel gating show significant differences when compared to other nAChRs. These differences might be originated from slight differential intramolecular rearrangements during gating for the different receptors and might lead each nAChR to be in tune with their physiological roles.
British Journal of Pharmacology
(2005)
145
, 963–974. doi:
10.1038/sj.bjp.0706224 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-1188 1476-5381 |
DOI: | 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706224 |