Regulation of the avidity of ternary complexes containing the human 5‐HT 1A receptor by mutation of a receptor contact site on the interacting G protein α subunit
Fusion proteins were constructed between the human 5‐HT 1A receptor and pertussis toxin‐resistant forms of both G i1 α and G o1 α mutated at residue 351 from cysteine to either glycine or isoleucine. Each of these was expressed stably in HEK293 cells. Increasing concentrations of GDP inhibited bindi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of pharmacology 2009-02, Vol.137 (3), p.345-352 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Fusion proteins were constructed between the human 5‐HT
1A
receptor and pertussis toxin‐resistant forms of both G
i1
α and G
o1
α mutated at residue
351
from cysteine to either glycine or isoleucine. Each of these was expressed stably in HEK293 cells.
Increasing concentrations of GDP inhibited binding of the agonist [
3
H]‐8‐OH‐DPAT but not the antagonist [
3
H]‐MPPF to each construct.
The IC
50
for GDP was greater for constructs containing isoleucine at residue
351
of the G proteins compared to those with glycine at this position.
The G protein antagonist suramin had similar effects to GDP on the binding of [
3
H]‐8‐OH‐DPAT.
The proportion of 5‐HT
1A
receptor binding sites detected by [
3
H]‐MPPF that displayed high affinity for 8‐OH‐DPAT was significantly greater when the interacting G protein contained isoleucine rather than glycine at residue
351
.
The 5‐HT
1A
receptor displayed similar avidity of interaction with G
i1
α and G
o1
α.
These results indicate that a higher avidity ternary complex is formed between 8‐OH‐DPAT, the 5‐HT
1A
receptor and G proteins when isoleucine rather than glycine is located at residue
351
of the interacting G protein.
British Journal of Pharmacology
(2002)
137
, 345–352. doi:
10.1038/sj.bjp.0704880 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-1188 1476-5381 |
DOI: | 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704880 |