Lack of evidence for systemic toxicity following topical chloramphenicol use

There has been considerable controversy regarding the safety of topical chloramphenicol in ophthalmic practice. The evidence for associated haematopoietic toxicity in idiosyncratic and dose-dependent forms was reviewed. The 7 cases of idiosyncratic haematopoietic reactions associated with topical ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eye (London) 1998-09, Vol.12 (5), p.875-879
Hauptverfasser: Walker, S, Diaper, C J M, Bowman, R, Sweeney, G, Seal, D V, Kirkness, C M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There has been considerable controversy regarding the safety of topical chloramphenicol in ophthalmic practice. The evidence for associated haematopoietic toxicity in idiosyncratic and dose-dependent forms was reviewed. The 7 cases of idiosyncratic haematopoietic reactions associated with topical chloramphenicol reported in the literature are refutable evidence for the existence of such a response. In Scotland, despite extensive prescription of topical chloramphenicol, the incidence of acquired aplastic anaemia was found to be low, as were associated reports of blood dyscrasias throughout the UK. The epidemiology of acquired aplastic anaemia failed to make an association with topical chloramphenicol use. High-performance liquid chromatography (minimum detection limit 1 mg/1) was used to investigate whether serum accumulation of chloramphenicol occurred after topical therapy in 40 patients. The mean dose of chloramphenicol eye drops used after 1 week of treatment was 8.0 mg, and after 2 weeks, 15.3 mg. As expected, chloramphenicol failed to accumulate to detectable levels. This supported the view that topical chloramphenicol was not a risk factor for inducing dose-related bone marrow toxicity. Calls for the abolition of treatment with topical chloramphenicol based on current data are not supported.
ISSN:0950-222X
1476-5454
DOI:10.1038/eye.1998.221