Infra-Red Absorption Spectrum of Diamond
ONE of the crucial arguments put forward by Raman in support of 'tetrahedral' and 'octahedral' diamonds being associated with the Type I and Type II diamonds of Robertson, and Fox and Martin, was that the tetrahedral form should have a certain fundamental vibration frequency acti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature (London) 1946-01, Vol.157 (3976), p.45-46 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ONE of the crucial arguments put forward by Raman in support of 'tetrahedral' and 'octahedral' diamonds being associated with the Type I and Type II diamonds of Robertson, and Fox and Martin, was that the tetrahedral form should have a certain fundamental vibration frequency active in infra-red absorption and also in scattering, while for the octahedral form this same frequency should be inactive in absorption. Raman identified this frequency with the well-known scattering line at 1,332 cm.
-1
and claimed that this frequency coincided with the infrared absorption “between 1350 and 1300 cm.
-1
” on Type I diamonds. One of the purposes of the paper by Willis and myself was to point out that this last was a serious mis-statement of fact, since the principal infra-red absorption maxima in this region of the spectrum lie at 1,286 cm.
-1
and 1,376 cm.
-1
, of which the former is much more intense than the latter. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-0836 1476-4687 |
DOI: | 10.1038/157045b0 |