A comparison of methods for the modeling of thermochemical convection

We have compared several methods of studying thermochemical convection in a Boussinesq fluid at infinite Prandtl number. For the representation of chemical heterogeneity tracer, marker chain, and field methods are employed. In the case of an isothermal Rayleigh‐Taylor instability, good agreement is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 1997-10, Vol.102 (B10), p.22477-22495
Hauptverfasser: Keken, P. E., King, S. D., Schmeling, H., Christensen, U. R., Neumeister, D., Doin, M.‐P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We have compared several methods of studying thermochemical convection in a Boussinesq fluid at infinite Prandtl number. For the representation of chemical heterogeneity tracer, marker chain, and field methods are employed. In the case of an isothermal Rayleigh‐Taylor instability, good agreement is found for the initial rise of the unstable lower layer; however, the timing and location of the later smaller‐scale instabilities may differ between methods. For a simulation of entrainment by thermal convection of a dense layer at the bottom of the mantle we found good agreement for a few overturn times. After this, differences between the results can be large. We propose intrinsic differences between the methods and possibly chaotic mixing effects may be the cause of the lack of detailed agreement. The comparison shows that high resolution is necessary for a reasonable thermochemical study. This will pose severe restrictions on the applicability of these methods to three‐dimensional situations.
ISSN:0148-0227
2156-2202
DOI:10.1029/97JB01353