Reply to "Rebuttal to Replies I and II by Varotsos et al." by F. Mulargia, W. Marzocchi and P. Gasperini
Mulargia et al. [1996] claim that earthquakes (EQs) can be “predicted” (in retrospective) “much more efficiently than VAN” using a “rule”, they obtained from PDE catalogue. We show that this claim is undoubtedly wrong. Their “rule” issues a great number of false alarms, which exceeds that of the “pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geophysical research letters 1996-05, Vol.23 (11), p.1341-1342 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Mulargia et al. [1996] claim that earthquakes (EQs) can be “predicted” (in retrospective) “much more efficiently than VAN” using a “rule”, they obtained from PDE catalogue. We show that this claim is undoubtedly wrong. Their “rule” issues a great number of false alarms, which exceeds that of the “predicted” EQs (mainly aftershocks) by a factor larger than 10. The errors diagram recommended by Keilis‐Borok [1996], reveals that Mulargia et al.'s [1996] “rule” corresponds to a non‐meaningful algorithm; on the other hand, this diagram reflects that VAN is meaningful. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
DOI: | 10.1029/96GL01289 |