Reply to "Rebuttal to Replies I and II by Varotsos et al." by F. Mulargia, W. Marzocchi and P. Gasperini

Mulargia et al. [1996] claim that earthquakes (EQs) can be “predicted” (in retrospective) “much more efficiently than VAN” using a “rule”, they obtained from PDE catalogue. We show that this claim is undoubtedly wrong. Their “rule” issues a great number of false alarms, which exceeds that of the “pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical research letters 1996-05, Vol.23 (11), p.1341-1342
Hauptverfasser: Varotsos, P., Eftaxias, K., Skordas, E., Hadjicontis, V., Lazaridou, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Mulargia et al. [1996] claim that earthquakes (EQs) can be “predicted” (in retrospective) “much more efficiently than VAN” using a “rule”, they obtained from PDE catalogue. We show that this claim is undoubtedly wrong. Their “rule” issues a great number of false alarms, which exceeds that of the “predicted” EQs (mainly aftershocks) by a factor larger than 10. The errors diagram recommended by Keilis‐Borok [1996], reveals that Mulargia et al.'s [1996] “rule” corresponds to a non‐meaningful algorithm; on the other hand, this diagram reflects that VAN is meaningful.
ISSN:0094-8276
1944-8007
DOI:10.1029/96GL01289