Bookshelf Kinematics and the Effect of Dilatation on Fault Zone Inelastic Deformation: Examples From Optical Image Correlation Measurements of the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence
The 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence initiated on July 4th with a series of foreshocks, including an Mw 6.4 event, that culminated a day later with the Mw 7.1 mainshock and resulted in rupture of a set of cross‐faults. In this study, we use subpixel correlation of optical satellite imagery to mea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2021-03, Vol.126 (3), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence initiated on July 4th with a series of foreshocks, including an Mw 6.4 event, that culminated a day later with the Mw 7.1 mainshock and resulted in rupture of a set of cross‐faults. In this study, we use subpixel correlation of optical satellite imagery to measure the displacement, finite strain, and rotation of the near‐field coseismic deformation to understand the kinematics of strain release along the surface ruptures. We find the average off‐fault deformation along the mainshock rupture is 34% and is significantly higher along the foreshock rupture (56%), suggesting it is a less structurally developed fault system. Measurements of the 2D dilatational strain along the mainshock rupture show a dependency of the width of inelastic strain with the degree of fault extension and contraction, indicating wider fault zones under extension than under shear. Measurements of the vorticity along the main, dextral rupture show that conjugate sinistral faults are embedded within zones of large clockwise rotations caused by the transition of strain beyond the tips of dextral faults leading to bookshelf kinematics. These rotations and bookshelf slip can explain why faults of different shear senses do not intersect one another and the occurrence of pervasive and mechanically unfavorable cross‐faulting in this region. Understanding the causes for the variation of fault zone widths along surface ruptures has importance for reducing the epistemic uncertainty of probabilistic models of distributed rupture that will, in turn, provide more precise estimates of the hazard distributed rupture poses to nearby infrastructure.
Key Points
We resolve finite strain, rotation, and dilatation, finding wider fault zones with increasing extension such as transtensional bends
Larger off‐fault strain and a larger shallow slip‐deficit suggests the foreshock occurred on a less mature fault system than the mainshock
Large rotations beyond fault tips explain why conjugate faults do not intersect and that cross‐faulting results from bookshelf kinematics |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-9313 2169-9356 |
DOI: | 10.1029/2020JB020551 |