Sulfur dioxide oxidation in clouds at Whiteface Mountain as a function of drop size

In situ oxidation of SO2 has been determined in clouds as a function of droplet size using a trace element technique during July 1998 at Whiteface Mountain, New York. The pH of the cloud water ranged from 2.8 to 4.7 with a mean of 3.4, and therefore SO2 oxidation was dominated by hydrogen peroxide....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2001-08, Vol.106 (D15), p.17347-17358
Hauptverfasser: Rattigan, O. V., Reilly, Jill, Judd, C. D., Moore, Katharine F., Das, Mita, Sherman, D. Eli, Dutkiewicz, Vincent A., Collett, Jeffrey L., Husain, Liaquat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In situ oxidation of SO2 has been determined in clouds as a function of droplet size using a trace element technique during July 1998 at Whiteface Mountain, New York. The pH of the cloud water ranged from 2.8 to 4.7 with a mean of 3.4, and therefore SO2 oxidation was dominated by hydrogen peroxide. Size‐fractioned cloud samples were collected from six different events at the mountain's summit (1.5 km above mean sea level) using a size‐fractionating California Institute of Technology Active Strand Cloudwater Collector. Bulk samples were collected using both passive and active collectors. During each event, below‐cloud and interstitial aerosols were collected every 2 hours. Cloud water and aerosol samples were analyzed for major ions and selected trace elements. Continuous measurements of gas phase species SO2, H2O2, and O3 were carried out at the summit and below‐cloud sites. Concentrations of cloud water SO42−, NO3−, H2O2, and trace elements, as well as pH, were largely independent of droplet size. The component of cloud water SO42− produced from in situ oxidation (SO2−4in) was also largely independent of droplet size. The results are in agreement with calculated relative production rates in the small and large drop sizes based on known laboratory reaction rates.
ISSN:0148-0227
2156-2202
DOI:10.1029/2000JD900807