Verapamil increases the survival of patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast carcinoma

Background Verapamil (VER), a potent calcium channel blocker, has been found to overcome P-gp-mediated multidrug resistance (MDR) and to increase sensitivity to cytotoxic anticancer drugs in refractory myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphorna. The value of VER for treating solid tumors is still a matter fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of oncology 2000-11, Vol.11 (11), p.1471-1476
Hauptverfasser: Belpomme, D., Gauthier, S., Pujade-Lauraine, E., Facchini, T., Goudier, M.-J., Krakowski, I., Netter-Pinon, G., Frenay, M., Gousset, C., Marié, F. N., Benmiloud, M., Sturtz, F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Verapamil (VER), a potent calcium channel blocker, has been found to overcome P-gp-mediated multidrug resistance (MDR) and to increase sensitivity to cytotoxic anticancer drugs in refractory myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphorna. The value of VER for treating solid tumors is still a matter for debate. Patients and methods We performed a prospective study in 99 patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC), to assess the clinical effect of oral VER given in association with chemotherapy. Instead of retreating patients with anthracycline, we used a partially noncross-resistant regimen (VF), combining vindesine (VDS) and 5-fluorouracil given as a continuous infusion (5-FU CI). Patients were randomly assigned to two cohorts. One cohort (47 patients) was treated in 28-day cycles, each involving the administration of VDS (3 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on days 1 and 10) and 5-FU CI, (400 mg/m2/day i.v. from day 1 to day 10). The other cohort (52 patients) received the same VDS and 5-FU treatment and an additional oral VER treatment (240 mg/day divided in 2 doses), from day 1 to day 28 of each cycle. Patients were treated until progression. Results The treatment was well tolerated and no side effects that could be attributed to VER were detected. Patients treated with VER had longer overall survival (OS) (median OS: 323 vs. 209 days, P=0.036) and a higher response rate (27% vs. 11%, P=0.04) than those not given VER. Progression-free survival (PFS) was also longer but the difference was not statistically significant (median PFS: 4.6 and 2.7 months for the VER and non-VER groups respectively, P=0.6). Conclusions This clinical trial demonstrates that a chemosensitizer, such as VER, can increase the survival of MBC patients with acquired anthracycline resistance.
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1023/A:1026556119020