Orthogonal Crystal Orientation in Double-Crystalline Block Copolymer
In this study, we explore the orientation of crystals formed within the lamellar domains of a diblock copolymer composed of two crystallizable blocks, that is, poly(l-lactide)-block-polyethylene (PLLA-b-PE). The orientation of both PLLA and PE crystals with respect to the lamellar interface was exam...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Macromolecules 2011-09, Vol.44 (17), p.6875-6884 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this study, we explore the orientation of crystals formed within the lamellar domains of a diblock copolymer composed of two crystallizable blocks, that is, poly(l-lactide)-block-polyethylene (PLLA-b-PE). The orientation of both PLLA and PE crystals with respect to the lamellar interface was examined under two types of crystallization condition with a broad range of crystallization temperatures (T c). The first type was the “two-stage crystallization”, where the PLLA block was allowed to crystallize before PE. The second was the “one-stage crystallization”, where PLLA and PE blocks competed to crystallize. A homeotropic crystal orientation was always observed for the PLLA crystals, with the crystalline stems lying parallel to the lamellar normal regardless of the crystallization condition, except when T c approached the glass-transition temperature of PLLA, where the orientation became random. A homogeneous crystal orientation with the PE crystalline stems oriented perpendicular to the lamellar normal was always identified at low-to-intermediate degree of undercooling, whereas at large undercooling, the crystals showed random orientation. The “orthogonal orientation” disclosed here was preserved over a broad range of undercooling. Our results further demonstrated that the orientation of both PLLA and PE crystals depended mainly on T c but was independent of the competitiveness of the two crystallization processes. This was a consequence of the strong segregation that made the two blocks crystallize independently within their respective microdomains. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0024-9297 1520-5835 |
DOI: | 10.1021/ma201124u |