Synthesis of pH-Degradable Nonionic Surfactants and Their Applications in Microemulsions

An oil-soluble pH-degradable nonionic surfactant with poly(ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether as the hydrophile and a cyclic ketal as the hydrophobe was synthesized for use in microemulsion-based protein extraction. The surfactant solubilized water in isooctane. Dynamic light-scattering measurements...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Langmuir 2001-10, Vol.17 (22), p.6816-6821
Hauptverfasser: Iyer, Maithili, Hayes, Douglas G, Harris, J. Milton
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An oil-soluble pH-degradable nonionic surfactant with poly(ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether as the hydrophile and a cyclic ketal as the hydrophobe was synthesized for use in microemulsion-based protein extraction. The surfactant solubilized water in isooctane. Dynamic light-scattering measurements showed formation of fairly monodisperse water-in-oil microemulsions of radii 4−6 nm, with very strong intermicellar attractive interactions. The ternary phase diagram for the system surfactant/water/isooctane at 23 °C consists of one-, two-, and three-phase regions as well as gel-like phases. The well-known “fish” pattern occurred for the phase diagram of temperature vs surfactant concentration at a fixed ratio of water-to-oil (1/1 g/g). The surfactant remained stable at neutral pH for several days but degraded rapidly when a mildly acidic phosphate buffer (pH = 5) was encapsulated in the water-in-oil microemulsion solution. Degradation occurred more rapidly when the microemulsion solution was brought in contact with an equal volume of pH 5 buffer solution in the presence of agitation. The encapsulation of protein (lysozyme) and its subsequent release upon contact with pH 5 buffer were observed, with 70% recovery of lysozyme mass in 0.5 h and 90% recovery in 1.0 h. The specific activity of the recovered lysozyme was within 90.4 ± 4.0% of the value for untreated lysozyme.
ISSN:0743-7463
1520-5827
DOI:10.1021/la010494t