Hydrodynamic Flow Regimes, Gas Holdup, and Liquid Circulation in Airlift Reactors

This study reports an experimental investigation into the hydrodynamic behavior of an external-loop airlift reactor (ALR) for the air−water system. Three distinct flow regimes are identifiednamely homogeneous, transition, and heterogeneous regimes. The transition between homogeneous and heterogeneo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Industrial & engineering chemistry research 1998-04, Vol.37 (4), p.1251-1259
Hauptverfasser: Abashar, Mohamed E, Narsingh, Udi, Rouillard, Andre E, Judd, Robin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study reports an experimental investigation into the hydrodynamic behavior of an external-loop airlift reactor (ALR) for the air−water system. Three distinct flow regimes are identifiednamely homogeneous, transition, and heterogeneous regimes. The transition between homogeneous and heterogeneous flow is observed to occur over a wide range rather than being merely a single point as has been previously reported in the literature. A gas holdup correlation is developed for each flow regime. The correlations fit the experimental gas holdup data with very good accuracy (within ±5%). It would appear, therefore, that a deterministic equation to describe each flow regime is likely to exist in ALRs. This equation is a function of the reactor geometry and the system's physical properties. New data concerning the axial variation of gas holdup is reported in which a minimum value is observed. This phenomenon is discussed and an explanation offered. Discrimination between two sound theoretical modelsnamely model I (Chisti et al., 1988) and model II (Garcia Calvo, 1989)shows that model I predicts satisfactorily the liquid circulation velocity with an error of less than ±10%. The good predictive features of model I may be due to the fact that it allows for a significant energy dissipation by wakes behind bubbles. Model I is now further improved by the new gas holdup correlations which are derived for the three different flow regimes.
ISSN:0888-5885
1520-5045
DOI:10.1021/ie9704612