Dihydrogen Bonding in Complex (PP3)RuH(η1‑BH4) Featuring Two Proton-Accepting Hydride Sites: Experimental and Theoretical Studies

Combining variable-temperature infrared and NMR spectroscopic studies with quantum-chemical calculations (density functional theory (DFT) and natural bond orbital) allowed us to address the problem of competition between MH (M = transition metal) and BH hydrogens as proton-accepting sites in dihydro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Inorganic chemistry 2014-01, Vol.53 (2), p.1080-1090
Hauptverfasser: Belkova, Natalia V, Bakhmutova-Albert, Ekaterina V, Gutsul, Evgenii I, Bakhmutov, Vladimir I, Golub, Igor E, Filippov, Oleg A, Epstein, Lina M, Peruzzini, Maurizio, Rossin, Andrea, Zanobini, Fabrizio, Shubina, Elena S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Combining variable-temperature infrared and NMR spectroscopic studies with quantum-chemical calculations (density functional theory (DFT) and natural bond orbital) allowed us to address the problem of competition between MH (M = transition metal) and BH hydrogens as proton-accepting sites in dihydrogen bond (DHB) and to unravel the mechanism of proton transfer to complex (PP3)RuH(η1-BH4) (1, PP3 = κ4-P(CH2CH2PPh2)3). Interaction of complex 1 with CH3OH, fluorinated alcohols of variable acid strength [CH2FCH2OH, CF3CH2OH, (CF3)2CHOH (HFIP), (CF3)3COH], and CF3COOH leads to the medium-strength DHB complexes involving BH bonds (3–5 kcal/mol), whereas DHB complexes with RuH were not observed experimentally. The two proton-transfer pathways were considered in DFT/M06 calculations. The first one goes via more favorable bifurcate complexes to BHterm and high activation barriers (38.2 and 28.4 kcal/mol in case of HFIP) and leads directly to the thermodynamic product [(PP3)RuHeq(H2)]+[OR]−. The second pathway starts from the less-favorable complex with RuH ligand but shows a lower activation barrier (23.5 kcal/mol for HFIP) and eventually leads to the final product via the isomerization of intermediate [(PP3)RuHax(H2)]+[OR]−. The B–Hbr bond breaking is the common key step of all pathways investigated.
ISSN:0020-1669
1520-510X
DOI:10.1021/ic4026206