Influence of Maturation on the Pyrolysis Products from Coals and Kerogens. 2. Modeling

A methodology to determine the chemistry and kinetics of the multiple reactions during geological maturation was developed, with a special emphasis on the representation of diagenesis and oil formation processes. The methodology combines a unique macromolecular and kinetic model for hydrocarbon pyrolysis, the FG-DVC (functional groupdevolatilization, vaporization, cross-linking) model, with a method of analysis based on thermogravimetric analysis with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (TG-FTIR). TG-FTIR pyrolysis data from several natural maturation series of coals and kerogens were measured, systematic trends with the degree of maturation were identified, and empirical processes and reaction kinetics during maturation necessary to induce these trends were estimated. This approach eliminates potential inaccuracies when extrapolating kinetic parameters obtained from laboratory experiments to geological conditions. The FG-DVC pyrolysis model was modified to include these maturation processes, with aqueous chemistry providing a guide for such modifications. The resulting FG-DVC maturation model was then used to predict the maturation of several immature samples through the well-known time/temperature history of the basin. The FG-DVC pyrolysis model was subsequently used to predict the open-system pyrolysis decomposition of the predicted maturation residues, and the predictions were compared to TG-FTIR data of the corresponding naturally matured samples. For most of the series investigated, the model gave good predictions of the variations in oxygenated gas precursors, tar T max, and extractable yield with maturation. Kinetics derived from open-system pyrolysis for bridge breaking were found to be applicable during maturation. However, faster kinetics were necessary to describe the removal of oxygenated gas precursors. In addition, the removal of methane and tar was found to be too slow during maturation when using open-system pyrolysis kinetics. Artificial maturation experiments using confined pyrolysis were also performed for comparison. While the evolution rates, during subsequent pyrolysis of the maturation residues, of oxygenated gas species are different from those obtained from samples naturally matured, the yields compare favorably with model predictions. The trends for pyrolysis tar and methane from artificially matured samples are similar to those of natural samples but suggest different kinetics.