Temperature Dependence of the Segmental Relaxation Time of Polymers Revisited

We analyze the temperature dependence of the segmental relaxation time τ of several low-T g polymers with varying molar masses (M) as obtained from field-cycling 1H NMR relaxometry and dielectric spectroscopy. They are compared with those of molecular liquids (ML). Time constants in the range 3 × 10...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Macromolecules 2015-05, Vol.48 (9), p.3005-3013
Hauptverfasser: Schmidtke, B, Hofmann, M, Lichtinger, A, Rössler, E. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We analyze the temperature dependence of the segmental relaxation time τ of several low-T g polymers with varying molar masses (M) as obtained from field-cycling 1H NMR relaxometry and dielectric spectroscopy. They are compared with those of molecular liquids (ML). Time constants in the range 3 × 10–12 s–1000 s, i.e., between T g and 413 K, are covered. Describing τ­(T) by the Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann (VFT) eq a systematic difference with respect to ML is found. While VFT fails for the latter it works well for polymers. The apparent activation energy at high temperatures shows a trend toward a temperature independent value E ∞. For polymers, its M-dependence follows that of T g(M), thus E ∞(M) can be described by a Fox–Flory equation. Attempting to understand the difference among the two classes of liquids, we take recourse to our approach first applied to ML [ J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 084504 ]; i.e., we decompose the temperature-dependent activation energy E(T) controlling τ­(T) in a constant high-temperature value E ∞(M) and a “cooperative part” E coop(T). The latter turns out to depend exponentially on temperature, as in ML. Introducing a plot in terms of E coop(T)/E ∞ vs T/E ∞, a master curve for each polymer series is revealed. Taking averaged parameters for all polymers a three-parameter fit well interpolates τ­(T) up to highest temperatures. Describing molecular and polymer liquids within the same approach, the difference lies in the fact that the ratio E ∞/E coop(T g) is systematically higher for polymers; i.e., τ­(T) displays an Arrhenius behavior extending over a larger temperature range.
ISSN:0024-9297
1520-5835
DOI:10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00204