Ratio between Random Coil Size and Crystalline Spacing Determines Mesophase Formation in Quenched Isotactic Polypropylene
The relationship between the molecular weight of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and mesophase formation during quenching was successfully established. Surprisingly, a unique number-average molecular weight (M n) dependent mesophase formation was identified that iPP with a lower or higher M n preferre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Macromolecules 2024-01, Vol.57 (1), p.250-262 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The relationship between the molecular weight of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and mesophase formation during quenching was successfully established. Surprisingly, a unique number-average molecular weight (M n) dependent mesophase formation was identified that iPP with a lower or higher M n preferred to form a pure mesophase but the ones with moderate M n failed in inducing a high fraction mesophase when the same quenching processes were applied. It was interpreted by the effect of coupling between the sizes of random coils and the crystalline spacing on the crystallization rate, which further affected the formation of mesophase. The M n represents the largest population of units possessing the same molecular weight in the system. Therefore, the crystallization rate was mainly controlled by the molecular chains with similar length of the largest fraction. A comparison between the radius of gyration of random coils in the melt and the final spacing of crystals induced during quenching suggests that the molecular chains in iPP with a lower M n needed to be disentangled before crystallization and the ones in iPP with a higher M n must be folded forth and back in crystallites during growth stage. Both cases led to a slow crystallization rate, benefiting the mesophase formation during quenching. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0024-9297 1520-5835 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acs.macromol.3c01906 |