Simultaneous in Situ X‑ray Diffraction and Calorimetric Studies as a Tool To Evaluate Gas Adsorption in Microporous Materials
Combined application of in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is a novel technique for rapidly evaluating the suitability of microporous materials for postcombustion CO2 capture. Further, while many microporous materials show promise for CO2 capture, most are no...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of physical chemistry. C 2016-01, Vol.120 (1), p.360-369 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Combined application of in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is a novel technique for rapidly evaluating the suitability of microporous materials for postcombustion CO2 capture. Further, while many microporous materials show promise for CO2 capture, most are not evaluated in the presence of water vapor, a major component of postcombustion flue gas. As a demonstration of the versatility of XRD-DSC techniques, representatives of the classes of materials typically proposed for CO2 capture, zeolites, and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) were studied: zeolite NaX, Ni-MOF-74 [Ni2(dobdc); dobdc = 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalate], ZIF-7 [ZIF: zeolitic imidazole framework, Zn(phim)2; phim: benzimidazole], and SBMOF-1 [Ca(sdb); sdb: 4,4′-sulfonyldibenzoate]. Although NaX and Ni-MOF-74 show very high affinity toward CO2 under idealized dry conditions, they are also very sensitive to the presence of water vapor and experience significant performance loss above 25% relative humidity (RH) at room temperature. Relative to NaX and Ni-MOF-74, ZIF-7 and SBMOF-1 show strong CO2 affinity even in the presence of 75% RH and may be more ideally suited for postcombustion flue gas CO2 capture than compounds with unsaturated metal sites. XRD-DSC is particularly powerful for evaluating the consequences of framework flexibility, with XRD providing the signature indicative of the structural rearrangement and the DSC providing the enthalpies of adsorption for each structure. This kind of detailed energy evaluation is not possible with other noncalorimetric methods. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1932-7447 1932-7455 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10159 |