CO 2 or SO 2 : Should It Stay, or Should It Go?

A broad computational analysis of carbon-centered radical formation via the loss of either CO or SO from the respective RXO radical precursors (X = C or S) reveals dramatic differences between these two types of dissociative processes. Whereas the C-C scission with the loss of CO is usually exotherm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of organic chemistry 2019-05, Vol.84 (10), p.6232-6243
Hauptverfasser: Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel, Wimmer, Alexander, Smith, Joel M, König, Burkhard, Alabugin, Igor V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6243
container_issue 10
container_start_page 6232
container_title Journal of organic chemistry
container_volume 84
creator Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel
Wimmer, Alexander
Smith, Joel M
König, Burkhard
Alabugin, Igor V
description A broad computational analysis of carbon-centered radical formation via the loss of either CO or SO from the respective RXO radical precursors (X = C or S) reveals dramatic differences between these two types of dissociative processes. Whereas the C-C scission with the loss of CO is usually exothermic, the C-S scission with the loss of SO is generally endothermic. However, two factors can make the C-S scissions thermodynamically favorable: increased entropy, characteristic for the dissociative processes, and stereoelectronic influences of substituents. The threshold between endergonic and exergonic C-S fragmentations depends on subtle structural effects. In particular, the degree of fluorination in a radical precursor has a notable impact on the reaction outcome. This study aims to demystify the intricacies in reactivity regarding the generation of radicals from sulfinates and carboxylates, as related to their role in radical cross-coupling.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.joc.9b00503
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_joc_9b00503</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>30993995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1095-16a611eadc6b5a44b681d35cab71e8a8dd2d404f750126c5ff33558c12197ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j8tqwzAQRUVpaNy06-6KPqC2ZySPbHVTimmTQCALZy9kyaYNCQ5Wssjf13k0s7kw9wGHsReEBEFgal1I1p1LdA1AIO9YhCQgVhqyexYBCBFLoeSYPYawhuGI6IGNJWgttaaIpeWSC971vDrpO69-usPG8_meV3t7fDs7t9e0-3hio9ZuQvN81QlbfX-tylm8WE7n5ecidgiaYlRWITbWO1WTzbJaFeglOVvn2BS28F74DLI2J0ChHLWtlESFQ4E6d1ZOWHqZdX0XQt-0Ztf_bm1_NAjmRG4GcjOQmyv50Hi9NHaHetv4W_4fVf4BZO1RWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>CO 2 or SO 2 : Should It Stay, or Should It Go?</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel ; Wimmer, Alexander ; Smith, Joel M ; König, Burkhard ; Alabugin, Igor V</creator><creatorcontrib>Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel ; Wimmer, Alexander ; Smith, Joel M ; König, Burkhard ; Alabugin, Igor V</creatorcontrib><description>A broad computational analysis of carbon-centered radical formation via the loss of either CO or SO from the respective RXO radical precursors (X = C or S) reveals dramatic differences between these two types of dissociative processes. Whereas the C-C scission with the loss of CO is usually exothermic, the C-S scission with the loss of SO is generally endothermic. However, two factors can make the C-S scissions thermodynamically favorable: increased entropy, characteristic for the dissociative processes, and stereoelectronic influences of substituents. The threshold between endergonic and exergonic C-S fragmentations depends on subtle structural effects. In particular, the degree of fluorination in a radical precursor has a notable impact on the reaction outcome. This study aims to demystify the intricacies in reactivity regarding the generation of radicals from sulfinates and carboxylates, as related to their role in radical cross-coupling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b00503</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30993995</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Journal of organic chemistry, 2019-05, Vol.84 (10), p.6232-6243</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1095-16a611eadc6b5a44b681d35cab71e8a8dd2d404f750126c5ff33558c12197ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1095-16a611eadc6b5a44b681d35cab71e8a8dd2d404f750126c5ff33558c12197ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8235-5969 ; 0000-0001-9289-3819 ; 0000-0002-6131-4850</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30993995$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>König, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alabugin, Igor V</creatorcontrib><title>CO 2 or SO 2 : Should It Stay, or Should It Go?</title><title>Journal of organic chemistry</title><addtitle>J Org Chem</addtitle><description>A broad computational analysis of carbon-centered radical formation via the loss of either CO or SO from the respective RXO radical precursors (X = C or S) reveals dramatic differences between these two types of dissociative processes. Whereas the C-C scission with the loss of CO is usually exothermic, the C-S scission with the loss of SO is generally endothermic. However, two factors can make the C-S scissions thermodynamically favorable: increased entropy, characteristic for the dissociative processes, and stereoelectronic influences of substituents. The threshold between endergonic and exergonic C-S fragmentations depends on subtle structural effects. In particular, the degree of fluorination in a radical precursor has a notable impact on the reaction outcome. This study aims to demystify the intricacies in reactivity regarding the generation of radicals from sulfinates and carboxylates, as related to their role in radical cross-coupling.</description><issn>0022-3263</issn><issn>1520-6904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j8tqwzAQRUVpaNy06-6KPqC2ZySPbHVTimmTQCALZy9kyaYNCQ5Wssjf13k0s7kw9wGHsReEBEFgal1I1p1LdA1AIO9YhCQgVhqyexYBCBFLoeSYPYawhuGI6IGNJWgttaaIpeWSC971vDrpO69-usPG8_meV3t7fDs7t9e0-3hio9ZuQvN81QlbfX-tylm8WE7n5ecidgiaYlRWITbWO1WTzbJaFeglOVvn2BS28F74DLI2J0ChHLWtlESFQ4E6d1ZOWHqZdX0XQt-0Ztf_bm1_NAjmRG4GcjOQmyv50Hi9NHaHetv4W_4fVf4BZO1RWg</recordid><startdate>20190517</startdate><enddate>20190517</enddate><creator>Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel</creator><creator>Wimmer, Alexander</creator><creator>Smith, Joel M</creator><creator>König, Burkhard</creator><creator>Alabugin, Igor V</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8235-5969</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9289-3819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6131-4850</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190517</creationdate><title>CO 2 or SO 2 : Should It Stay, or Should It Go?</title><author>Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel ; Wimmer, Alexander ; Smith, Joel M ; König, Burkhard ; Alabugin, Igor V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1095-16a611eadc6b5a44b681d35cab71e8a8dd2d404f750126c5ff33558c12197ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>König, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alabugin, Igor V</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of organic chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel</au><au>Wimmer, Alexander</au><au>Smith, Joel M</au><au>König, Burkhard</au><au>Alabugin, Igor V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CO 2 or SO 2 : Should It Stay, or Should It Go?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organic chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Org Chem</addtitle><date>2019-05-17</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>6232</spage><epage>6243</epage><pages>6232-6243</pages><issn>0022-3263</issn><eissn>1520-6904</eissn><abstract>A broad computational analysis of carbon-centered radical formation via the loss of either CO or SO from the respective RXO radical precursors (X = C or S) reveals dramatic differences between these two types of dissociative processes. Whereas the C-C scission with the loss of CO is usually exothermic, the C-S scission with the loss of SO is generally endothermic. However, two factors can make the C-S scissions thermodynamically favorable: increased entropy, characteristic for the dissociative processes, and stereoelectronic influences of substituents. The threshold between endergonic and exergonic C-S fragmentations depends on subtle structural effects. In particular, the degree of fluorination in a radical precursor has a notable impact on the reaction outcome. This study aims to demystify the intricacies in reactivity regarding the generation of radicals from sulfinates and carboxylates, as related to their role in radical cross-coupling.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30993995</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.joc.9b00503</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8235-5969</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9289-3819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6131-4850</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3263
ispartof Journal of organic chemistry, 2019-05, Vol.84 (10), p.6232-6243
issn 0022-3263
1520-6904
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_joc_9b00503
source ACS Publications
title CO 2 or SO 2 : Should It Stay, or Should It Go?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A21%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CO%202%20or%20SO%202%20:%20Should%20It%20Stay,%20or%20Should%20It%20Go?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organic%20chemistry&rft.au=Dos%20Passos%20Gomes,%20Gabriel&rft.date=2019-05-17&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=6232&rft.epage=6243&rft.pages=6232-6243&rft.issn=0022-3263&rft.eissn=1520-6904&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.joc.9b00503&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E30993995%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/30993995&rfr_iscdi=true