CO 2 or SO 2 : Should It Stay, or Should It Go?
A broad computational analysis of carbon-centered radical formation via the loss of either CO or SO from the respective RXO radical precursors (X = C or S) reveals dramatic differences between these two types of dissociative processes. Whereas the C-C scission with the loss of CO is usually exotherm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of organic chemistry 2019-05, Vol.84 (10), p.6232-6243 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6243 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 6232 |
container_title | Journal of organic chemistry |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel Wimmer, Alexander Smith, Joel M König, Burkhard Alabugin, Igor V |
description | A broad computational analysis of carbon-centered radical formation via the loss of either CO
or SO
from the respective RXO
radical precursors (X = C or S) reveals dramatic differences between these two types of dissociative processes. Whereas the C-C scission with the loss of CO
is usually exothermic, the C-S scission with the loss of SO
is generally endothermic. However, two factors can make the C-S scissions thermodynamically favorable: increased entropy, characteristic for the dissociative processes, and stereoelectronic influences of substituents. The threshold between endergonic and exergonic C-S fragmentations depends on subtle structural effects. In particular, the degree of fluorination in a radical precursor has a notable impact on the reaction outcome. This study aims to demystify the intricacies in reactivity regarding the generation of radicals from sulfinates and carboxylates, as related to their role in radical cross-coupling. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.joc.9b00503 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_joc_9b00503</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>30993995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1095-16a611eadc6b5a44b681d35cab71e8a8dd2d404f750126c5ff33558c12197ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j8tqwzAQRUVpaNy06-6KPqC2ZySPbHVTimmTQCALZy9kyaYNCQ5Wssjf13k0s7kw9wGHsReEBEFgal1I1p1LdA1AIO9YhCQgVhqyexYBCBFLoeSYPYawhuGI6IGNJWgttaaIpeWSC971vDrpO69-usPG8_meV3t7fDs7t9e0-3hio9ZuQvN81QlbfX-tylm8WE7n5ecidgiaYlRWITbWO1WTzbJaFeglOVvn2BS28F74DLI2J0ChHLWtlESFQ4E6d1ZOWHqZdX0XQt-0Ztf_bm1_NAjmRG4GcjOQmyv50Hi9NHaHetv4W_4fVf4BZO1RWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>CO 2 or SO 2 : Should It Stay, or Should It Go?</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel ; Wimmer, Alexander ; Smith, Joel M ; König, Burkhard ; Alabugin, Igor V</creator><creatorcontrib>Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel ; Wimmer, Alexander ; Smith, Joel M ; König, Burkhard ; Alabugin, Igor V</creatorcontrib><description>A broad computational analysis of carbon-centered radical formation via the loss of either CO
or SO
from the respective RXO
radical precursors (X = C or S) reveals dramatic differences between these two types of dissociative processes. Whereas the C-C scission with the loss of CO
is usually exothermic, the C-S scission with the loss of SO
is generally endothermic. However, two factors can make the C-S scissions thermodynamically favorable: increased entropy, characteristic for the dissociative processes, and stereoelectronic influences of substituents. The threshold between endergonic and exergonic C-S fragmentations depends on subtle structural effects. In particular, the degree of fluorination in a radical precursor has a notable impact on the reaction outcome. This study aims to demystify the intricacies in reactivity regarding the generation of radicals from sulfinates and carboxylates, as related to their role in radical cross-coupling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b00503</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30993995</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Journal of organic chemistry, 2019-05, Vol.84 (10), p.6232-6243</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1095-16a611eadc6b5a44b681d35cab71e8a8dd2d404f750126c5ff33558c12197ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1095-16a611eadc6b5a44b681d35cab71e8a8dd2d404f750126c5ff33558c12197ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8235-5969 ; 0000-0001-9289-3819 ; 0000-0002-6131-4850</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30993995$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>König, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alabugin, Igor V</creatorcontrib><title>CO 2 or SO 2 : Should It Stay, or Should It Go?</title><title>Journal of organic chemistry</title><addtitle>J Org Chem</addtitle><description>A broad computational analysis of carbon-centered radical formation via the loss of either CO
or SO
from the respective RXO
radical precursors (X = C or S) reveals dramatic differences between these two types of dissociative processes. Whereas the C-C scission with the loss of CO
is usually exothermic, the C-S scission with the loss of SO
is generally endothermic. However, two factors can make the C-S scissions thermodynamically favorable: increased entropy, characteristic for the dissociative processes, and stereoelectronic influences of substituents. The threshold between endergonic and exergonic C-S fragmentations depends on subtle structural effects. In particular, the degree of fluorination in a radical precursor has a notable impact on the reaction outcome. This study aims to demystify the intricacies in reactivity regarding the generation of radicals from sulfinates and carboxylates, as related to their role in radical cross-coupling.</description><issn>0022-3263</issn><issn>1520-6904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j8tqwzAQRUVpaNy06-6KPqC2ZySPbHVTimmTQCALZy9kyaYNCQ5Wssjf13k0s7kw9wGHsReEBEFgal1I1p1LdA1AIO9YhCQgVhqyexYBCBFLoeSYPYawhuGI6IGNJWgttaaIpeWSC971vDrpO69-usPG8_meV3t7fDs7t9e0-3hio9ZuQvN81QlbfX-tylm8WE7n5ecidgiaYlRWITbWO1WTzbJaFeglOVvn2BS28F74DLI2J0ChHLWtlESFQ4E6d1ZOWHqZdX0XQt-0Ztf_bm1_NAjmRG4GcjOQmyv50Hi9NHaHetv4W_4fVf4BZO1RWg</recordid><startdate>20190517</startdate><enddate>20190517</enddate><creator>Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel</creator><creator>Wimmer, Alexander</creator><creator>Smith, Joel M</creator><creator>König, Burkhard</creator><creator>Alabugin, Igor V</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8235-5969</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9289-3819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6131-4850</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190517</creationdate><title>CO 2 or SO 2 : Should It Stay, or Should It Go?</title><author>Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel ; Wimmer, Alexander ; Smith, Joel M ; König, Burkhard ; Alabugin, Igor V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1095-16a611eadc6b5a44b681d35cab71e8a8dd2d404f750126c5ff33558c12197ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>König, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alabugin, Igor V</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of organic chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel</au><au>Wimmer, Alexander</au><au>Smith, Joel M</au><au>König, Burkhard</au><au>Alabugin, Igor V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CO 2 or SO 2 : Should It Stay, or Should It Go?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organic chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Org Chem</addtitle><date>2019-05-17</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>6232</spage><epage>6243</epage><pages>6232-6243</pages><issn>0022-3263</issn><eissn>1520-6904</eissn><abstract>A broad computational analysis of carbon-centered radical formation via the loss of either CO
or SO
from the respective RXO
radical precursors (X = C or S) reveals dramatic differences between these two types of dissociative processes. Whereas the C-C scission with the loss of CO
is usually exothermic, the C-S scission with the loss of SO
is generally endothermic. However, two factors can make the C-S scissions thermodynamically favorable: increased entropy, characteristic for the dissociative processes, and stereoelectronic influences of substituents. The threshold between endergonic and exergonic C-S fragmentations depends on subtle structural effects. In particular, the degree of fluorination in a radical precursor has a notable impact on the reaction outcome. This study aims to demystify the intricacies in reactivity regarding the generation of radicals from sulfinates and carboxylates, as related to their role in radical cross-coupling.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30993995</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.joc.9b00503</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8235-5969</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9289-3819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6131-4850</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3263 |
ispartof | Journal of organic chemistry, 2019-05, Vol.84 (10), p.6232-6243 |
issn | 0022-3263 1520-6904 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_joc_9b00503 |
source | ACS Publications |
title | CO 2 or SO 2 : Should It Stay, or Should It Go? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A21%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CO%202%20or%20SO%202%20:%20Should%20It%20Stay,%20or%20Should%20It%20Go?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organic%20chemistry&rft.au=Dos%20Passos%20Gomes,%20Gabriel&rft.date=2019-05-17&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=6232&rft.epage=6243&rft.pages=6232-6243&rft.issn=0022-3263&rft.eissn=1520-6904&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.joc.9b00503&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E30993995%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/30993995&rfr_iscdi=true |