CO 2 or SO 2 : Should It Stay, or Should It Go?

A broad computational analysis of carbon-centered radical formation via the loss of either CO or SO from the respective RXO radical precursors (X = C or S) reveals dramatic differences between these two types of dissociative processes. Whereas the C-C scission with the loss of CO is usually exotherm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of organic chemistry 2019-05, Vol.84 (10), p.6232-6243
Hauptverfasser: Dos Passos Gomes, Gabriel, Wimmer, Alexander, Smith, Joel M, König, Burkhard, Alabugin, Igor V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A broad computational analysis of carbon-centered radical formation via the loss of either CO or SO from the respective RXO radical precursors (X = C or S) reveals dramatic differences between these two types of dissociative processes. Whereas the C-C scission with the loss of CO is usually exothermic, the C-S scission with the loss of SO is generally endothermic. However, two factors can make the C-S scissions thermodynamically favorable: increased entropy, characteristic for the dissociative processes, and stereoelectronic influences of substituents. The threshold between endergonic and exergonic C-S fragmentations depends on subtle structural effects. In particular, the degree of fluorination in a radical precursor has a notable impact on the reaction outcome. This study aims to demystify the intricacies in reactivity regarding the generation of radicals from sulfinates and carboxylates, as related to their role in radical cross-coupling.
ISSN:0022-3263
1520-6904
DOI:10.1021/acs.joc.9b00503