Does the GFA of Alloys Depend on the Atomic Size Ratio: A DT-Based ML Study

The difficulty in the prediction of the glass-forming ability (GFA) of alloys hinders the development of new materials with excellent properties. The GFA of alloys is investigated by using three machine learning models based on a decision tree, with a dataset covering 1404 multicomponent alloys coll...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Crystal growth & design 2023-08, Vol.23 (8), p.5912-5918
Hauptverfasser: Pan, Jiaming, Jia, Yushuang, Li, Kenli, Liao, Lei, Qiu, Liping, Wu, Fan, Tian, Zean
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The difficulty in the prediction of the glass-forming ability (GFA) of alloys hinders the development of new materials with excellent properties. The GFA of alloys is investigated by using three machine learning models based on a decision tree, with a dataset covering 1404 multicomponent alloys collected from peer-reviewed publications. With the composition (including 94 elements, C94), three characteristic temperatures (T3), and three geometric parameters (G3) as the input feature, the XGBoost model achieves the best prediction result {RMSE = 2.5635, R 2 = 0.7250}, improved by 11.20% compared with the latest published paper. Among seven possible input feature sets, “C94 + T3” achieves the best with {RMSE = 2.5250, R 2 = 0.7332} on the XGBoost model. Further analysis revealed that superimposing G3 on C94 always reduces XGBoost performance; therefore, the GFA of alloys is independent of the atomic size ratio; this is consistent with the fundamental principle of physics: the radii of atoms are determined by element types. A precision of 95.5% is obtained for binary alloys even with an incomplete feature set. Therefore, with “C94 + T3” input features, the XGBoost is generally reliable to effectively predict the GFA of all alloys.
ISSN:1528-7483
1528-7505
DOI:10.1021/acs.cgd.3c00509