Commentary
On the first page of this very timely paper the author quotes Linda Gordon: “Birth control has always been primarily an issue of politics, not of technology.” This statement provides a theme for response to Jing-Bao Nie's arguments. In reading this paper, I found myself reminded of two of Georg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics 1999-10, Vol.8 (4), p.477-479 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | On the first page of this very timely paper the
author quotes Linda Gordon: “Birth control has always
been primarily an issue of politics, not of technology.”
This statement provides a theme for response to Jing-Bao
Nie's arguments. In reading this paper, I found myself
reminded of two of George Orwell's insights: (1) When
governments use euphemisms they are usually up to no good:
“Such phraseology is needed if one wants to name
things without calling up mental pictures of them”
[e.g., the use of “remedial measure” for
abortion]. “A mass of Latin words falls upon
the facts like soft snow, blurring the outlines and covering
up the details.” (2) Sexuality and the sexual act (I
would add here reproduction—having children) can be
a powerful tool of subversion and rebellion. One's
sexuality (and reproductive ability) can be the last line
of defense against repression or authority. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0963-1801 1469-2147 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S096318019923407X |