Prediction of PM2.5 concentration in Ulaanbaatar with deep learning models

Rapid socio-economic development and urbanization have led to an increasingly serious air pollution problem in Ulaanbaatar (UB), the capital of Mongolia. PM2.5 pollution has become the most pressing aspect of UB air pollution. Therefore, monitoring and predicting PM2.5 concentration in UB is of grea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urban climate 2023-01, Vol.47, p.101357, Article 101357
Hauptverfasser: Suriya, Natsagdorj, Narantsogt, Aorigele, Zhou, Haijun, Sachurila
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Rapid socio-economic development and urbanization have led to an increasingly serious air pollution problem in Ulaanbaatar (UB), the capital of Mongolia. PM2.5 pollution has become the most pressing aspect of UB air pollution. Therefore, monitoring and predicting PM2.5 concentration in UB is of great significance for the health of the local people and environmental management. As of yet, very few studies have used models to predict PM2.5 concentrations in UB. Using data from 0:00 on June 1, 2018 to 23:00 on April 30, 2020, we proposed two deep learning models based on Bayesian optimized LSTM (Bayes-LSTM) and CNN-LSTM. We utilized hourly observed data including Himawari8 (H8) aerosol optical depth (AOD), meteorology, and PM2.5 concentration as input for prediction of PM2.5 concentrations. The correlation strengths between meteorology, AOD, and PM2.5 was analyzed using the grey correlation analysis method; the comparison of the performance improvement of the model by using the AOD input value was tested, and the performance of these models was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE). The prediction accuracies of Bayes-LSTM and CNN-LSTM deep learning models were both improved when AOD was included as an input parameter. Improvement of the prediction accuracy of the CNN-LSTM model was particularly enhanced in the non-heating season; in the heating season, the prediction accuracy of the Bayes-LSTM model slightly improved, while the prediction accuracy of the CNN-LSTM model slightly decreased. We propose two novel deep learning models for PM2.5 concentration prediction in UB, Bayes-LSTM, and CNN-LSTM deep learning models. Pioneering the use of AOD data from H8 and demonstrating the inclusion of AOD input data improves the performance of our two proposed deep learning models.
ISSN:2212-0955
2212-0955
DOI:10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101357