Energy-efficient train control using nonlinear bounded regenerative braking

•The energy-efficient train control (EETC) problem including three control variables.•Consider the effect of the actual nonlinear bounded regenerative braking constraint.•Derivation of optimal control structure with regenerative and mechanical braking.•Application of EETC problem on different numeri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research. Part C, Emerging technologies Emerging technologies, 2020-12, Vol.121, p.102852, Article 102852
Hauptverfasser: Scheepmaker, Gerben M., Goverde, Rob M.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•The energy-efficient train control (EETC) problem including three control variables.•Consider the effect of the actual nonlinear bounded regenerative braking constraint.•Derivation of optimal control structure with regenerative and mechanical braking.•Application of EETC problem on different numerical realistic experiments. Energy-efficient train control (EETC) has been studied a lot over the last decades, because it contributes to cost savings and reduction of CO2 emissions. The aim of EETC is to minimize total traction energy consumption of a train run given the running time in the timetable. Most research is focused to apply mechanical braking on this problem. However, current trains are able to use regenerative braking, which leads to another optimal driving strategy compared to mechanical braking. Research on EETC with a realistic nonlinear bounded model for regenerative braking or a combination between regenerative and mechanical braking is limited. The aim of this paper is to compare the difference between the EETC with regenerative and/or mechanical braking. First, we derive the optimal control structure for the problems with different braking combinations. Second, we apply the pseudospectral method on different scenarios where we investigate the effect of varying speed limits and gradients on the different driving strategies. Results indicate that compared to pure mechanical braking, combined regenerative and mechanical braking leads to a driving strategy with higher energy savings, a lower optimal cruising speed, a shorter coasting phase and a higher speed at the beginning of the braking phase. In addition, a nonlinear bounded regenerative braking curve leads to a different driving strategy compared to a constant braking rate that is commonly used in literature. We show that regenerative braking at a constant braking rate overestimates the total energy savings.
ISSN:0968-090X
1879-2359
DOI:10.1016/j.trc.2020.102852