Shingled design lightweight photovoltaic modules using honeycomb sandwich structures as backsheets

The expanding scale of the photovoltaic (PV) market has intensified the focus on PV module designs for diverse applications. Research actively pursues lightweight PV modules, replacing front glass with polymer films as a suitable design solution. Lightweight PV modules with front-film structures req...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Solar energy materials and solar cells 2024-12, Vol.278, p.113152, Article 113152
Hauptverfasser: Park, Min-Joon, Youn, Sungmin, Kim, Minseob, Lee, Eunbi, Jeon, Kiseok, Jeong, Chaehwan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The expanding scale of the photovoltaic (PV) market has intensified the focus on PV module designs for diverse applications. Research actively pursues lightweight PV modules, replacing front glass with polymer films as a suitable design solution. Lightweight PV modules with front-film structures require additional structures to compensate for their inadequate mechanical rigidity. Hence, we integrated honeycomb sandwich structures into lightweight PV modules, substituting them for traditional PV backsheets. It increased the mechanical rigidity of lightweight PV modules and effectively replaced the PV backsheet through a simple one-step lamination process. Consequently, we successfully fabricated lightweight PV modules with a shingled design, achieving a conversion power of 205.80 W in an area of 1.034 m2, facilitating the integration of more solar cells in a limited space. Additionally, standard reliability tests were performed on a PV module weighing only 6.2 kg/m2. •A honeycomb sandwich structure was placed on the backside of the front-film-type PV module instead of the backsheet.•The shingled-design lightweight PV modules had an area of 1.034 m2, with only a weight of 6.2 kg/m2.•Standard reliability was assessed through DH1000, TC200, PID, and ML2400 tests.
ISSN:0927-0248
DOI:10.1016/j.solmat.2024.113152