Use of real-time ultrasound measurements of fat thickness and longissimus thoracis muscle characteristics for predicting body fat depots in crossbred hair ewes

This study aimed to predict body fat depots using ultrasound measurements (USM) of fat thickness and longissimus thoracis muscle characteristics in crossbred hair ewes. A total of 24 animals with a mean body weight (BW) of 37 ± 4 kg and a body condition score of 2.39 ± 0.49 were used. USM was record...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Small ruminant research 2024-12, Vol.241, p.107400, Article 107400
Hauptverfasser: García-Cigarroa, José Carlos, Luna-Mendicuti, Armin Abelardo, Canul-Solís, Jorge Rodolfo, Castillo-Sanchez, Luis Enrique, Herrera-Camacho, José, Vargas-Bello-Pérez, Einar, Chay-Canul, Alfonso J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to predict body fat depots using ultrasound measurements (USM) of fat thickness and longissimus thoracis muscle characteristics in crossbred hair ewes. A total of 24 animals with a mean body weight (BW) of 37 ± 4 kg and a body condition score of 2.39 ± 0.49 were used. USM was recorded 24 h before slaughter and included: subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), area (LTMA), amplitude (LTA), and depth (LTD) of the l. thoracis muscle and kidney fat thickness (µKFT). After slaughter, the internal fat (IF) was separated, classified, and weighed as mesenteric (MF), omental (OF), or pelvic fat (PF). The left half was then separated into subcutaneous and intermuscular fat (CF), and the muscle and bone tissues were weighed separately and adjusted to take account of the whole animal. Total body fat (TBF) was determined to be the IF plus the CF weights. LTA and LTMA correlated poorly to moderately with fat depots (0.37 ≤ r ≤ 0.74, P < 0.05). Other than CF, µKFT showed poor to moderate correlation with the other depots of body fat (0.44 ≤ r ≤ 0.75, P < 0.05). The regression model used to predict MF had r2 of 0.87 (RSD=0.14 kg) and included BW and LTMA (P
ISSN:0921-4488
DOI:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2024.107400