Improving combustion and emission characteristics of a biogas/biodiesel-powered dual-fuel diesel engine through trade-off analysis of operation parameters using response surface methodology

•Biodiesel was tested as a pilot fuel for biogas run on a dual-fuel diesel engine.•Experimental investigations at several compression ratios and engine load.•RSM was used for a robust model prediction with R2 in the range of 0.8673 – 0.9917.•The validation test confirmed expected output was within t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainable energy technologies and assessments 2022-10, Vol.53, p.102455, Article 102455
Hauptverfasser: Bora, Bhaskor J, Dai Tran, Thanh, Prasad Shadangi, Krushna, Sharma, Prabhakar, Said, Zafar, Kalita, Pankaj, Buradi, Abdulrajak, Nhanh Nguyen, Van, Niyas, Hakeem, Tuan Pham, Minh, Thanh Nguyen Le, Chau, Dung Tran, Viet, Phuong Nguyen, Xuan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Biodiesel was tested as a pilot fuel for biogas run on a dual-fuel diesel engine.•Experimental investigations at several compression ratios and engine load.•RSM was used for a robust model prediction with R2 in the range of 0.8673 – 0.9917.•The validation test confirmed expected output was within the 6% error range.•17.53 of CR and 76.84% of engine load were optimal parameters. The present study focused on using dual-fuel such as Mahua oil biodiesel and biogas in a diesel engine to analyze performance and emission by varying compression ratio (CR) and engine loads. Following the experimental step, the response surface approach was used to model-predict, and optimize. The variance analysis was used to create relationship functions between the independent control variables (engine loads and CR) and their dependent response variables (performance and emission indices). A robust model is indicated by a high coefficient of determination value for all outputs (0.8673 – 0.9917). The optimization yielded 15.25% brake thermal efficiency, 326 °C exhaust gas temperature, 2.85 kg/h biogas flow rate, 68.9% liquid fuel replacement, and 44 bar peak cylinder pressure. A trade-off study of engine performance vs. emission at optimal operating settings produced 4.45 vol% CO2, 39 ppm NOx, 90 ppm HC, and 90.17 ppm CO. The validation test in the lab revealed that all of the predicted output was within a 6% error range. This research indicated that dual-fuel might be an excellent choice for improving waste-to-energy prospects, performance, and emissions.
ISSN:2213-1388
DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2022.102455