Open access, thermodynamically consistent, electrolyte NRTL model for piperazine, AMP, water, CO2 systems on Aspen Plus

•A new, open access, thermodynamic model for piperazine and blends was regressed.•The model uses an innovative manner to specify the piperazine zwitterion.•The model is validated against a wide range of experimental data.•This is the first thermodynamically consistent PZ and AMP/PZ model on Aspen Pl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Separation and purification technology 2024-12, Vol.350, p.127924, Article 127924
Hauptverfasser: Yi, Ningtong, Herraiz, Laura, Fang, Mengxiang, García, Susana, van der Spek, Mijndert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•A new, open access, thermodynamic model for piperazine and blends was regressed.•The model uses an innovative manner to specify the piperazine zwitterion.•The model is validated against a wide range of experimental data.•This is the first thermodynamically consistent PZ and AMP/PZ model on Aspen Plus. This study developed a comprehensive, open-access, thermodynamically consistent, validated vapour-liquid equilibrium model for CO2 absorption into aqueous solutions of piperazine (PZ) activated 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) on Aspen Plus. This solves a two-decade-old problem of inconsistent specification of PZ, and lacking AMP/PZ, thermodynamic models on Aspen Plus, supporting robust process modelling of AMP/PZ-based CO2 capture systems, considered the contemporary benchmark. The model coverage is wide: total amine concentrations from 30 wt% to 50 wt%, AMP/PZ mole ratios from 0.46 to 23.1, CO2 loadings from 0.04 to 1.07 mol CO2/mol amine, and temperatures from 20 °C to 160 °C. The significance lies in the model’s innovative treatment of the zwitterion PZH+CO2–, leading to accurate VLE predictions and closed charge balances. Absolute average relative deviations (AARD) are 16.6 % to 22.3 % for CO2 partial pressure predictions and 6.3 % to 7.7 % for absorption heats. Gibbs-Helmholz and flash calculated absorption heats consistently compare within 1.5 % to 7.0 %, signalling the model’s thermodynamic consistency.
ISSN:1383-5866
DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2024.127924