Multi-objective optimization of the intensified extractive distillation with side-reboiler for the recovery of ethyl acetate and methanol from wastewater
•The suitable entrainer is screened via the thermodynamic insights.•Development of intensified extractive distillation with side-reboiler.•Optimization of proposed process using multi-objective particle swarm algorithm. This work explores the recovery of ethyl acetate (EtAC) and methanol (MeOH) from...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Separation and purification technology 2023-04, Vol.310, p.123131, Article 123131 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •The suitable entrainer is screened via the thermodynamic insights.•Development of intensified extractive distillation with side-reboiler.•Optimization of proposed process using multi-objective particle swarm algorithm.
This work explores the recovery of ethyl acetate (EtAC) and methanol (MeOH) from wastewater stream using three different extractive distillation (ED) processes, i.e., the triple-column ED (TCED), four-column ED (FCED), and the energy-intensified TCED with side-reboiler (TCED-SR). All the three processes are conceptually designed and then optimized using multi-objective particle swarm optimization with total annual cost (TAC), CO2 emission, and process route index (PRI) as objectives. Altogether, the TCED-SR is recommended to provide the best economic and environmental performances, as reflected by the lowest TAC and CO2 emission. It provides 34% and 20% lower TAC relative to TCED and FCED, respectively. Additionally, the CO2 emission is 39% and 17% lower with respect to the TCED and FCED. In the places where safety requirement is strictly regulated, the FCED is recommended since the PRI for the TCED-SR is high, which denotes that the process should be operated with care. However, the TAC and CO2 emission for the FCED is higher by about 21% and 36% with respect to the TCED-SR while it is lower than the TCED by about 20% and 17%, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1383-5866 1873-3794 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123131 |