Factors influencing the ecological security of island cities: A neighborhood-scale study of Zhoushan Island, China

•The ecological security of island cities should be assessed in a manner that takes into account their island status.•On Zhoushan Island, China, urbanisation has played the biggest role in increasing ecological footprint.•Urban densification and optimisation are gradually improving ecological securi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainable cities and society 2020-04, Vol.55, p.102029, Article 102029
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Yizhou, Zhang, Tiancheng, Zhang, Huan, Pan, Tao, Ni, Xueling, Grydehøj, Adam, Zhang, Jianming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•The ecological security of island cities should be assessed in a manner that takes into account their island status.•On Zhoushan Island, China, urbanisation has played the biggest role in increasing ecological footprint.•Urban densification and optimisation are gradually improving ecological security.•There are significant neighbourhood-level differences in ecological security on Zhoushan Island. Many island cities have vulnerable ecosystems, yet island ecosystems also present special challenges for research. Ecological footprint analysis is an effective method of evaluating the ability of island cities to engage in regional ecological sustainable development. This study uses ecological footprint analysis combined with the ArcGIS platform to evaluate the ecological security of 14 neighborhoods on Zhoushan Island (Zhejiang Province, China) in 2010, 2013, and 2015. The partial least squares regression model is used to explore factors affecting spatial and temporal differences in ecological security in the island’s neighborhoods and to help optimize the island’s ecological sustainable development. Results reveal that Zhoushan Island’s per capita ecological footprint decreased from 7.355 hm2 in 2010 to 4.662 hm2 in 2015, yet throughout the study period, the per capita ecological footprint remained higher than the per capita ecological carrying capacity in all neighborhoods. Although the island’s ecological security has gradually improved, there continue to be large ecological deficits and ecological pressure. To improve the island city’s ecological security, we should optimize the mode of urban development, develop renewable energy sources, protect ecologically valuable land, improve the scale and quality of urban zones and transportation infrastructure, and improve residents’ industrial and consumption structures.
ISSN:2210-6707
2210-6715
DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102029