Reply to: Comment on “Misinterpretation of the Shuttleworth equation”
It is argued that the criticism by Faraji et al. is unfounded and clarified further why surface stress on a strain-free solid, as postulated by Shuttleworth, does not exist.
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scripta materialia 2024-09, Vol.250, p.116185, Article 116185 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | It is argued that the criticism by Faraji et al. is unfounded and clarified further why surface stress on a strain-free solid, as postulated by Shuttleworth, does not exist. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1359-6462 1872-8456 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2024.116185 |