Reply to: Comment on “Misinterpretation of the Shuttleworth equation”

It is argued that the criticism by Faraji et al. is unfounded and clarified further why surface stress on a strain-free solid, as postulated by Shuttleworth, does not exist.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scripta materialia 2024-09, Vol.250, p.116185, Article 116185
1. Verfasser: Makkonen, Lasse
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:It is argued that the criticism by Faraji et al. is unfounded and clarified further why surface stress on a strain-free solid, as postulated by Shuttleworth, does not exist.
ISSN:1359-6462
1872-8456
DOI:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2024.116185