Does expected idiosyncratic skewness of firms' profit predict the cross-section of stock returns? Evidence from China
Motivated by existing evidence of a preference among investors for assets with lottery-like payoffs and for portfolios that are under-diversified, this study investigates the relation between expected idiosyncratic skewness of firms' profit (EISP) and cross-sectional stock returns, using sample...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research in international business and finance 2023-01, Vol.64, p.101839, Article 101839 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Motivated by existing evidence of a preference among investors for assets with lottery-like payoffs and for portfolios that are under-diversified, this study investigates the relation between expected idiosyncratic skewness of firms' profit (EISP) and cross-sectional stock returns, using samples from the Chinese A-share market. Portfolio-level analyses and firm-level cross-sectional regressions suggest that firms with higher EISP have lower expected returns than those with lower EISP. A long-short value-weighted portfolio can earn an annualized risk-adjusted excess return (i.e., Fama-French five-factor alpha) of 11.3% when sorting by the EISP. The negative effect of EISP on the cross-sectional stock returns is robust to controlling for well-documented firm characteristics and risk factors, rather than being subsumed by firms' profit instability or accounting-based downside risk. Of particular interest, the effect is more pronounced among stocks with more lottery-like characteristics, indicating that the immaturity of investors is an underlying driver of the mispricing in the effect.
[Display omitted]
•The expected idiosyncratic skewness of firms' profit (EISP) has negative predictive power for subsequent stock returns.•The finding is robust to controlling for well-documented firm characteristics and risk factors.•Rational risk-based explanations as well as the limits to arbitrage and lottery preference hypotheses are examined.•The effect in the Chinese market is probably driven by the immaturity of investors. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0275-5319 1878-3384 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101839 |