Comments on “Morphogenesis of Balkhania balkhanica Mamontova, 1966 (benthic foraminifera) from Lower Cretaceous successions along the northern Tethyan margin (NE and Central Iran)”
The study by Gheiasvand and Bartolini (2023) treated Balkhania balkhanica and Torinosuella peneropliformis as morphotypes of a single species, Balkhania balkhanica, leading to incorrect conclusions about its characteristics. Their analysis overlooked key aspects of the life cycle, morphotypes, ecolo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revue de micropaléontologie 2024-07, Vol.83, p.100783, Article 100783 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The study by Gheiasvand and Bartolini (2023) treated Balkhania balkhanica and Torinosuella peneropliformis as morphotypes of a single species, Balkhania balkhanica, leading to incorrect conclusions about its characteristics. Their analysis overlooked key aspects of the life cycle, morphotypes, ecological roles, and paleogeographical distribution of B. balkhanica due to a misunderstanding of foraminiferal systematics. Notably, its megalospheric forms can reach a maximal diameter of 5.2 mm, whereas its microspheric forms may reach up to 15 mm. Its stratigraphic range is limited to the Barremian-early Aptian interval. Although B. balkhanica and Choffatella decipiens share equivalent ecological niches, they are not found together in the same strata. Ch. decipiens has a much wider distribution, over most of the Tethys realm, whereas Balkhania balkhanica is primarily found in the northern Tethys platforms, with the notable exception of Lebanon in the southern Tethys platforms. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0035-1598 0035-1598 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.revmic.2024.100783 |