Exercise training decreases intercostal and transversus abdominis muscle blood flows in heart failure rats during submaximal exercise

•Heart failure rats were randomized to exercise-trained (ET) or sedentary groups.•During exercise, diaphragm muscle blood flows (BF) were not different between groups.•Intercostal and transversus abdominis BFs were lower in the ET group with exercise.•The lower respiratory muscle BFs with ET was lik...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory physiology & neurobiology 2021-10, Vol.292, p.103710-103710, Article 103710
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Joshua R., Hirai, Daniel M., Copp, Steven W., Ferguson, Scott K., Holdsworth, Clark T., Hageman, K. Sue, Poole, David C., Musch, Timothy I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Heart failure rats were randomized to exercise-trained (ET) or sedentary groups.•During exercise, diaphragm muscle blood flows (BF) were not different between groups.•Intercostal and transversus abdominis BFs were lower in the ET group with exercise.•The lower respiratory muscle BFs with ET was likely via a reduced ventilatory response. Diaphragm muscle blood flow (BF) and vascular conductance (VC) are elevated with chronic heart failure (HF) during exercise. Exercise training (ExT) elicits beneficial respiratory muscle and pulmonary system adaptations in HF. We hypothesized that diaphragm BF and VC would be lower in HF rats following ExT than their sedentary counterparts (Sed). Respiratory muscle BFs and mean arterial pressure were measured via radiolabeled microspheres and carotid artery catheter, respectively, during submaximal treadmill exercise (20 m/min, 5 % grade). During exercise, no differences were present between HF + ExT and HF + Sed in diaphragm BFs (201 ± 36 vs. 227 ± 44 mL/min/100 g) or VCs (both, p > 0.05). HF + ExT compared to HF + Sed had lower intercostal BF (27 ± 3 vs. 41 ± 5 mL/min/100 g) and VC (0.21 ± 0.02 vs. 0.31 ± 0.04 mL/min/mmHg/100 g) during exercise (both, p 
ISSN:1569-9048
1878-1519
DOI:10.1016/j.resp.2021.103710