Humid or dry culture with medium renewal: impact on A-Grade Day 5 Blastocysts. Randomized prospective cohort study

In recent years, several publications have highlighted the advantages of humid culture (HC) over dry culture (DC) (70% HR) and dry (0% HR) chambers of a Geri incubator (Genea Biomedx, Australia). Ejaculated sperm ICSI cycles with >5 fresh MII were included in the analysis. Time-lapse cleavage tim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reproductive biomedicine online 2024-05, Vol.48, p.104040, Article 104040
Hauptverfasser: Penas, E. Güell, Espino, E. M. Perulli, Ciurana, V. M. Chapero, Fàbregas, A. Cabré, López, A. Mauri, Pérez, J. I. Mazzanti
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In recent years, several publications have highlighted the advantages of humid culture (HC) over dry culture (DC) (70% HR) and dry (0% HR) chambers of a Geri incubator (Genea Biomedx, Australia). Ejaculated sperm ICSI cycles with >5 fresh MII were included in the analysis. Time-lapse cleavage timings were manually gathered. HC remained undisturbed while medium was renewed on D+3 in DC by changing the culture dish. Fertilization, overall blastocyst development and A-Grade Day 5 blastocysts rates (ASEBIR's morphology criteria) were compared. Statistical analysis consisted on Chi-squared test, t-student test and logistic regression for computation of Odds Ratio (OR, 95%CI). While no statistically significant differences were observed in the fertilization rate (DC: 76.4%; HC: 69.1%, NS) or the overall usable blastocyst development rate (DC: 48.6%; HC: 53.1%, NS), noteworthy distinctions emerged in the proportion of top-graded embryos based on ASEBIR's morphology criteria. Specifically, the A-Grade Day 5 blastocyst development rate displayed significant disparities when comparing all fertilized embryos in each culture type (DC: 19.9%; HC: 32.3%; p
ISSN:1472-6483
DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104040