U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope systematics of detrital zircon from the basal part of the late Ediacaran sedimentary succession of the Moldova-Podillya basin (SW Baltica): Implications for glacial vs. alluvial origin

•Ediacaran Bakhtyn Beds from SW Baltica formed through alluvial, not glacial processes.•The absence of “exotic” detrital zircon ages argues against long-distance transport.•The predominant provenance is locally derived from the underlying basement.•Zircon U-Pb and Hf isotope values, and multidimensional scaling support these inferences.•Detrital zircons help resolve glacial vs. alluvial origin for poorly-exposed units. The Neoproterozoic is marked by two long-lasting global Snowball Earth glaciations—the Sturtian (ca. 715–660 Ma) and the Marinoan (ca. 639–635 Ma)—as well as the shorter-lived, potentially regional Gaskiers glaciation at ca. 580–579 Ma. The subsequent Ediacaran and early Cambrian periods are generally interpreted to be characterized by a warm climate without low-latitude, sea-level glaciations. However, a number of locally, and, sometimes regionally developed sedimentary units worldwide have been interpreted to record sea-level glaciations during this time interval. Some of these units crop-out poorly, were affected by deformation and metamorphism, lack definitive sedimentologic textures and structures, and are poorly dated. Their sedimentological characteristics, as well as age constraints, are thus often insufficient to determine whether they have a glacial origin and if their ages fit into well-defined time intervals marked by cold climate indicators. Detrital zircon geochronology may help distinguish between the heterogeneous and extensive provenances that are indicative of glaciation, and more homogenous, and local provenances that are more typical of alluvial settings. In this paper, we use trends in detrital zircon age distribution patterns from the lowermost late Ediacaran sedimentary succession of the Moldova-Podillya basin in Baltica to constrain the provenance of the Volyn Group sediments. Here, the origin of diamictites within the Hrushka Formation has long been a topic of debate, centered on either a glacial or alluvial origin. Detrital zircons from two sandstone samples and one conglomerate sample from the Bakhtyn Beds of the Hrushka Formation, and two sandstone samples from the Lomoziv Beds of the unconformably overlying Mohyliv Formation were dated using U-Pb zircon LA-ICP-MS techniques. Their age patterns are compared with published data for the overlying Cosăuți (Yampil) and Bernashivka beds as well as new dates for the immediately underlying Paleoproterozoic granites to test for a proposed glacial origin for the Bakhtyn Be