FT-IR/UATR and FT-IR transmission quantitative analysis of PBT/PC blends

Polymer blends are produced to achieve properties that pure polymers are unable to. The qualitative analysis of these blends is not always satisfactory to point out failures in the final product and, therefore, the determination of their content might be required. The aim of this study is to develop...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polymer testing 2020-05, Vol.85, p.106447, Article 106447
Hauptverfasser: Ferreira, Ana Carolina, Diniz, Milton Faria, Babetto Ferreira, Ana Clélia, Sanches, Natália Beck, da Costa Mattos, Elizabeth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Polymer blends are produced to achieve properties that pure polymers are unable to. The qualitative analysis of these blends is not always satisfactory to point out failures in the final product and, therefore, the determination of their content might be required. The aim of this study is to develop quantitative methodologies using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), reflection mode with the universal attenuated total reflectance accessory (UATR) and transmission techniques, for the determination of the content of each polymer present in the polymer blend poly (butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and polycarbonate (PC). FT-IR/UATR presented better results using the relative band (A1772/A1716). FT-IR/UATR presented error of 2.30%, which is a little higher than the accuracy limit of the spectrometer (≤2%), but still adequate for industrial applications. •Polymer blends are produced to achieve properties that pure polymers are unable to.•The qualitative analysis of blends is very important to point out failures in the final product.•Quantitative methods were developed using FT-IR, in the MIR region, by reflection (UATR) and transmission.•The relative bands A1772/A1716 (PC/PBT) were used in both methodologies, the best result, was the reflection method (UATR).•The FT-IR/UATR error was 2.30%, slightly above the precision limit (≤ 2%), but the methodology is accurate.
ISSN:0142-9418
1873-2348
DOI:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106447