RETRACTED: Gallium and scandium doping effect on the sensing performance of aluminum phosphide nanotubes toward toxic ethylene oxide gas

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). This article has been retracted at the request of the editor. In investigating concerns brought up regarding inappropriate advertisement of the authorship of the arti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics letters. A 2022-07, Vol.441, p.128145, Article 128145
Hauptverfasser: Jasim, Saade Abdalkareem, Al-Gazally, Moaed E., Majdi, Hasan Sh, Karim, Yasir Salam, Opulencia, Maria Jade Catalan, Kadhim, Mustafa M., Hammid, Ali Thaeer, Mustafa, Yasser Fakri, Kheirollahi Nezhad, Parvaneh Delir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). This article has been retracted at the request of the editor. In investigating concerns brought up regarding inappropriate advertisement of the authorship of the article, the editor reached out to the authors for an explanation. Post-publication, the editor also discovered suspicious changes in authorship between the original submission and the revised version of this paper. In summary, the paper was submitted by a sole author, Parvaneh Delir Kheirollahi Nezhad. During revision, the author names Saade Abdalkareem Jasim (New First Author), Moaed E. Al-Gazally, Hasan Sh. Majdi, Yasir Salam Karim, Maria Jade Catalan Opulencia, Mustafa M. Kadhim (New Corresponding Author), Ali Thaeer Hammid, and Yasser Fakri Mustafa were all added to the revised paper without explanation and without exceptional approval by the journal editor, which is contrary to the journal policy on changes to authorship. The editor reached out to the authors for an explanation to the above points, but they failed to reply. Overall, the editor feels that the findings of the manuscript cannot be relied upon, and the article needs to be retracted.
ISSN:0375-9601
DOI:10.1016/j.physleta.2022.128145