Review and assessment of the ammonium perchlorate chemistry in AP/HTPB composite propellant gas-phase chemical kinetics mechanisms
Physical and chemical processes of ammonium perchlorate and hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (AP/HTPB) composite propellant combustion have been studied for several decades, and more than 50 years of model development can be reported. Computational methods focus on the heterogeneous aspects—the sol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Progress in energy and combustion science 2025-01, Vol.106, p.101195, Article 101195 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Physical and chemical processes of ammonium perchlorate and hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (AP/HTPB) composite propellant combustion have been studied for several decades, and more than 50 years of model development can be reported. Computational methods focus on the heterogeneous aspects—the solid-phase and its decomposition—whereas AP self-deflagration and burning characteristics should be seen as a multi-step, physiochemical process. There has been a lack of systematic studies on the gas-phase chemical kinetics mechanisms for AP combustion, with emphasis on the starting gas-phase species NH3 and HClO4. Only three recent detailed gas-phase mechanisms with sufficient detail in terms of the number of chemical reactions and number of species are currently available in the literature prior to 2023, and simulations are carried out within the present review to assess the state of their current performance and to highlight potential knowledge gaps that should be filled. Given the importance and prevalence of AP in modern propellants, it is surprising that the chemical kinetics of AP combustion are very much understudied. The authors highlight the fact that the few existing AP mechanisms have never been fully vetted against an applicable database of experimental results, certainly not in the manner that mechanisms are typically validated within the combustion science community for fuels such as hydrogen and various hydrocarbons. This review does not put forward such a mechanism, but rather 1) brings to light the limitations of current AP kinetics mechanisms in predicting some limited, available kinetics data, and 2) underlines the need for additional, fundamental data that can be used to calibrate an AP kinetics model. A limited gas-phase experimental database was identified from currently available sources for two main compound families: ammonia (NH3) and perchloric acid (HClO4). The decomposition of AP is initiated by NH4ClO4 → NH3 + HClO4 and leads to these two rather complex molecules that differ strongly in their nature and consequently in their reaction schemes for combustion processes. On the one hand, existing measurements of ignition delay times, laminar flame speeds, and speciation were collected for NH3, N2O, and NO2, and on the other hand, a similar albeit much smaller body of experimental results was assembled for HClO4, ClO2, and Cl2. These global kinetics data were used to evaluate modern AP/HTPB propellant models. We observe that there is much |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0360-1285 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pecs.2024.101195 |