The duplicity of the European Union Common Fisheries Policy in third countries: Evidence from the Gulf of Guinea

The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) espouses the significance of fisheries and their contribution to food and economic security globally. It emphasises the need for the conservation of the ocean and the integrity of marine resources in the interest of future generations...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ocean & coastal management 2020-02, Vol.184, p.104953, Article 104953
Hauptverfasser: Okafor-Yarwood, Ifesinachi, Belhabib, Dyhia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) espouses the significance of fisheries and their contribution to food and economic security globally. It emphasises the need for the conservation of the ocean and the integrity of marine resources in the interest of future generations. Demonstrating an understanding of the need to implement the UNCLOS, the European Union (EU) introduced a Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) in 1983, later revised in 2013 effective from 2014. This paper discusses how the implementation of the EU's CFP is undermining the long-term food and economic security of highly vulnerable regions such as West and Central Africa. Focusing on examples from Liberia and Guinea Bissau, the paper elaborates further on how the EU fisheries subsidies, which are central to its Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements (SFPA) with third countries, contradict the provisions of its CFP, as they continue to target fully exploited and overexploited species notwitstanding the declared commitment to sustainability. The current paper also provides evidence that uncovers the EU's selective application of its own regulations on preventing Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing thereby illuminating the extent of its duplicity. •The CFP protects EU waters, but damages the marine environment of third countries to which it has now been extended.•Subsidies under the CFP are a key driver of this overexploitation of fisheries in third countries.•Abuse of their SFPAs by EU vessels undermines local food security and provokes conflict with artisanal fishers.•Naively low royalties on fishing agreements to be renegotiated and resulting higher income invested in marine enforcement.
ISSN:0964-5691
1873-524X
DOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104953