A numerical study on float design for wave energy converter

In the present work, a computational fluid dynamic simulation has been performed to investigate the movement of free-floating objects in wavy water. The movement of objects of different shapes, namely rectangular, trapezoidal, and hemisphere, has been simulated using the volume of the fluid model, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ocean engineering 2022-11, Vol.264, p.112410, Article 112410
Hauptverfasser: Prakash, Ravi, Rathaur, Ranjana, Gupta, Shivam, Ghosh, Sumana, Kumar, Deepak, Agarwal, Rajesh, Vatsa, Sanjay Kumar, Khandige, Meghasham
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In the present work, a computational fluid dynamic simulation has been performed to investigate the movement of free-floating objects in wavy water. The movement of objects of different shapes, namely rectangular, trapezoidal, and hemisphere, has been simulated using the volume of the fluid model, and a satisfactory match between the simulated data and experimental results has been obtained. It is observed that the nature of vortices influences the movement of different shapes of the same mass. The rectangular shape has more vertical displacement as compared to the other two shapes. With the increase in characteristic dimension, power absorption efficiency increases and become constant, indicating a critical value of characteristic dimension for a given wave condition. On the other hand, with an increase in wave height, power absorption increases, but efficiency decreases. Trapezoidal shape with fin found to be optimum float shape. •Influence of different shape, effective density of a free floating buoy on power and efficiency.•Rectangular and trapezoidal buoy are more preferable than hemispherical buoy for power generation.•Power generation increases with increased wave height.
ISSN:0029-8018
1873-5258
DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112410