Theoretical investigation of wave reflection from partially perforated caisson sitting on a rubble mound foundation

This study theoretically examines a partially perforated caisson sitting on a rubble mound foundation. A Jarlan-type perforated caisson consisted of a perforated front wall, a solid rear wall and a wave-absorbing chamber between them. When the incident wave overlaps with waves reflected from the per...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ocean engineering 2021-09, Vol.235, p.109085, Article 109085
Hauptverfasser: Peihong, Zhao, Dapeng, Sun, Hao, Wu, Yucheng, Li
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study theoretically examines a partially perforated caisson sitting on a rubble mound foundation. A Jarlan-type perforated caisson consisted of a perforated front wall, a solid rear wall and a wave-absorbing chamber between them. When the incident wave overlaps with waves reflected from the perforated front wall and the solid rear wall, its energy can be significantly reduced. Correlative research projects primarily focused on fully and partially perforated caissons sitting on a solid seabed or a solid step. The investigation of partially perforated caisson sitting on a rubble-mound foundation was scant and mainly by means of experiments and numerical modeling. In present research, a mathematical model based on eigenfunction expansion method is developed to predict regular and irregular wave reflections from a partially perforated caisson sitting on a rubble-mound foundation. This model has clear physical meaning and is easy to solve. It covers all details from previous research on perforated caissons, and further considers the effect of the permeable rubble mound foundation. •The analytical model considers the porous effect of the rubble bed under the perforated caisson.•As the porosity of the rubble bed increases, Kr first decreases and then increases. An optimal porosity is about 0.5–0.7.•Increasing the relative berm width results in oscillatory behavior by Kr and its maxima and minima all gradually dampen.•As the relative foundation height increases, Kr decreases gently and then increases. Its minima are at 0.4 
ISSN:0029-8018
DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109085